![]() ![]() Is it Anandtech's problem NV has spent money on devs trying to get them to pay attention to their tech? AMD could do this stuff too if they weren't losing 6Bil in 3 years time (more?). Or am I just missing something in this article? AT smartly took what they had to work with (a single 560 from ASUS - mentioned as why they have no SLI benchmarks in with 560), clocked it at the speeds you'd buy (based on checking specs online) and gave us the best idea they could of what we'd expect on a shelf or from oem. Get it? They down-clocked the card ASUS sent to show what NV would assume they'd be clocked at on the shelves. They put NV's name on the SLOWER speeds in the charts, but NV didn't send them a card. Nvidia didn't have anything to do with the article. ![]() ![]() They tested at 3 speeds, giving us a pretty good idea of multiple variants you'd see in the stores. There is no ref design for this card (reference clocks, but not a card). TheJian - Wednesday, link The heavily overclocked card is from ASUS. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |